I’m no expert on culture. However, I am both an observer and a purveyor of the thing. It’s certainly a big thing, like economics, politics or religion. It’s a thing that surrounds us, defines us, and invades us. It’s about customs, our relationships and institutions. It underscores so much of what we think, how we behave and how we look at the world and one another. Of course, culture is not a static thing as it is ever evolving. On the other hand, being a humanly constructed thing, there are things about culture that remain unchanging as, in fact, there are things about us that remain unchanged.
I expect there was a time not all that long ago, in relative terms, where people did not think a whole lot about culture. They went about their lives in a kind of passive acceptance that this is just the way things were or were supposed to be. A German goldsmith by the name of Johannes Gutenberg sort of busted that wide open around 1440 AD when he invented movable type … what we know as a printing press. Voila!: The European Renaissance and then we were off to the races. Massive upheavals followed, including revolutions in science, religion, economics and politics. And, of course, culture.
With communication democratized, individual opinions suddenly mattered, sometimes in a very big way. Finding their voice, citizens of the western world became instant commentators. Pre-Gutenberg, the likes of Benjamin Franklin and Voltaire (cultural critics both), among countless others, would have disappeared into history.
Fast forward to Gutenberg’s 20th century twin, the silicon microchip, and we have another massive reorientation underway, with similar tectonic shifts in science, religion, economics and politics. And, of course, culture.
Please excuse my long contextualization involving history. Can’t quite shake the DNA.
All of this brings me back to a topic I’ve certainly touched on in many ways, although maybe not directly in the sense I’d like to today.
We are a tribal species and some commentators will argue that it’s this tribal nature that is most definitive of how we construct our societies. We seek relationships with those who share our values, principles and customs and we shy away from (or fear or even abhor) those who don’t. We commonly make judgments about the kind of art or institutions or means of expression we think are valuable or threatening. We do this all of the time, both consciously and unconsciously. Can’t help it. Some of us try to adapt and find out that adaptation is not all that bad in some circumstances. On the other hand, we find adaptation to some things extremely undesirable. And, some people plain want to turn back the clock entirely.
For instance (and in the cause of full disclosure), I can’t much stand 20th century “classical” music or much of what we can loosely call “modern art.” Now, before I’m called a complete snob, I’d like to put out that I’m not an absolutist on this. There are a number of clear exceptions. But, as a whole, give me Mozart over Shostakovich or Sibelius. Give me Rembrandt over Picasso. And, those are the modern artists who I don’t find ultimately debasing (well, I may have to step back on that with some of Picasso’s work.) What’s the distinction and what does this have to do with the point I have yet to make?
It all comes down to value … as in, what we value most dearly. What are the guiding principles that govern our lives; the way we seek to live out the short time we’re here? To cut to the chase, our expression, whether it be in art or language or the institutions we create to frame and govern our societies, is the window into who we are and what we value as important.
Expression is a hard thing to think about because it has so many layers. We may value one thing but find ourselves expressing ourselves (behaving) quite differently. We may think we are the one defining how best to behave but discover that we are merely conforming to social influences and pressure for all sorts of reasons. After awhile, we may look back and wonder where the change began, if we wonder at all.
It will come as no surprise but I believe we are created with a purpose. (Well, many purposes but they’re all connected under a simple umbrella.) It’s that purpose that gives rise to our values and guiding principles, which should define our expression and the things we hold dear.
A person who seeks to lift up others each day … to help alleviate suffering in their neighbors’ lives, who encourages others on a regular basis, acts lovingly when it’s a hard thing to do, wakes up with a sense of hope even when things appear dismal, behaves very different from one who:
Seeks to judge others every day for their perceived faults and inadequacies, chooses to first look at what is wrong, rather than what is right, shouts rather than embraces, gravitates to violence rather than peace, to deceit and self-promotion rather than integrity and selfless giving. This is the one who is at home with debasing, rather than uplifting, one who enjoys shocking others rather than consoling them and treating them with kindness and compassion.
Some will examine our “western” culture today and applaud it. We live with far less constraints than ever before in the history of our species. We are free to behave publicly in ways that would have been unimaginable not that long ago. While the coarseness that is a result was always a feature of human society (Caligula, anyone?), we are witnessing its extension seemingly everywhere. For this aging person, it’s depressing.
I bemoan the degradation of the thing we used to call good manners. Of natural respect for others. Of deference. Of civil language. So much now has to be “sensational,” as in powerfully tapping into our senses, beating at us for attention. How much time and opportunity are we given for reflection about the things we value the most and where that sense of value comes from? Our culture is now evolving at hyper-speed, seemingly an inevitable thing.
What to do? It seems everywhere I gaze I see criticism. And the criticism is quite frequently fueled by fear, anger and resentment. With so many platforms by which these sentiments can be delivered, there is constant competition for air time, bandwidth or reader volume. Furthermore, with attention spans diminishing, there is a corresponding need to intensify the volume, so as to be heard. And that accelerates the push to embrace the more unseemly side of who we are.
What if our first inclination is to lift up rather than tear down? Admittedly, this can be very tough. Lord knows, I’m opinionated and decidedly unhappy at much I see. With the heart torn and anger close to the surface, it’s easy to press aside inclinations to be positive and uplifting. Who among us does not have a base side to our nature? Seeing no hands, we can rest assured we’re part of a very large club. So, what to do?
For starters, I’ll let the apostle Paul share some simple yet sage advice. In a letter to the church in Ephesus, which is now in modern day Turkey, he writes in Ephesians 4:29 “Do not let unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs, that it might benefit those who listen.”
Let us all meditate on what he could mean by “unwholesome talk” and what kind of talk would be “helpful for building others us according to their needs.”
Is expletive-laden language wholesome? Does it help us to become better than we are? Does it reflect respect for those around us? What does it mean to be “whole” anyway? What kind of person is one who has been “built up according to their needs?” What do people “need,” actually? Is our expression more of our own need to be recognized, even if it’s done intrusively? Or, rather, should our expression be other-centered, with an eye to helping to bring others out of suffering or restrictive places? Or, to just pay attention that there is a person next to us, probably a stranger, who could use a smile and a kind word? Are we quick to pass along the demeaning tidbit, rather than to seek the joyful one?
I get that bad stuff, in many cases, needs to be exposed. Of that, I’m a fan. However, in the rush to expose the bad (the nature of which is certainly divisive), we lose sight of the good. It beats us down and robs us of some of the wonderful things that make us human. It robs us of our sense of purpose. We are not mere animals, seeking food and procreation before we die. We are creative beings, with remarkable potential. Whether we use that potential to help lift ourselves out of the gutter or bring the gutter all around us is, I think, worth pondering about.
I am both product and designer of our culture. I am free to make a choice. How I choose to express myself will reflect the choice I make. I can make a difference, no matter how small. I need plenty of help and reminders but it’s reassuring to look back and see even the most modest of changes. Thank God.