There are certainly a whole lot of narratives at play these days. And that’s an understatement.
Narratives, of course, are stories. They are the way we organize the stuff of life to arrive at meaning. Narratives give shape and form to all of the things that make us who we are, what we care about, how we behave and make sense of life.
We learn narratives at the earliest stages of life and we never stop. Of course, we also begin constructing our own and delivering them to others about the same time. And, we never stop.
When I taught history, I worked hard on day one to dispel the notion that it was all about things like dates and a chronicling of events. Instead, it was about how we create stories of those things in a way that they inform us about the whys of life. A lot of people just want the facts, which is not a bad place to start but it’s a bad way to end. Observers or interpreters of facts should understand that the importance of those things … the meaning of those things … is the point of it all.
Honestly, until less than two years ago, I don’t think I’d ever heard the phrase, “fake news.” Maybe you had. Now, we can’t escape it. This is just another way Group A and Group B decide that their narrative is the real deal and the other’s is the false deal. It’s about true narratives and false narratives.
Actually, I think about this a lot. Not fake news, per se, but about the different narratives that proliferate and how we process them.
As a lay historian and theologian of sorts (well, ok, also an observer of things political, economic, social, cultural, scientific an so on), I am keenly interested in the role of narrative in this multicultural, post-modern, rapidly changing world in which we find ourselves.
Take for instance the concept of hero and villain. In some sense, we know what these two kinds of people are. The hero bravely quests for good. The villain is heck-bent on bad. One narrative says it’s good to differentiate these two qualities … that it’s healthy to set up these archetypes as oppositional in order to shape our cultures in a positive way.
A second narrative says there is really no such thing. Heroes are, indeed, little more than flawed individuals who may even be pursuing bad things (in the eyes of certain observers who disagree with their values and intents). Similarly, villains may only be villains because they are not understood appropriately … that their villainy is not as significant as some would imagine or it’s not their fault that they behave in certain ways. So, we have the anti-hero and the villain who we are called to root for. Happens all of the time now.
How are we supposed to make sense of all of this … especially when the information and narrative construction comes at us like an unleashed fire hydrant?
As these pages are largely about topics of faith and belief, I will head on over there for now.
Some of the voices I respect the most when it comes to those who want to influence others on the nature of meaning are those who set up a certain narrative and then seek to show its flaws … how that first narrative is misleading or flat out wrong. It was a narrative that developed legs for a variety of reasons; legs that took it further and further away from the thing that launched the story in the first place.
To cut to the chase, Christianity is chock full of this kind of thing. We can spend forever talking about why this is the case. Lord knows, people much smarter than I have done just that.
I am continually amazed when people say, this is what Christianity stands for or this is what is the most important thing about what it means to be a Christian and I think, “Where does that come from?”
Let’s take judgment for starters. Nothing like picking a small topic like judgment.
Now, everyone likes judgment. I mean everyone. (A couple of theologians who I think really have it on the ball say that this innate wiring is another proof of God but let’s not go there fully right now.) As I was saying, everyone likes judging as long as we are the judges and not the judgees. (Made up word.). Or, we like judges who look at the world as we do and enforce those values upon those who look at the world differently than we do.
So, everyone likes judgment but it gets a little dicey when it comes to that quality in an all-powerful God. Of course, if we construct God in our own image (and we tend to be judgmental) or see that quality in God as the most important component of his nature, we create or buy into a narrative that God’s judgment is his dominant feature. God becomes a pretty handy tool to sweep away all that is evil and that’s very gratifying. On the other hand, it’s always a neat thing to point the sword elsewhere, not asking how the sword is justifiably pointed inward. This issue sets up all sorts of narratives by which Christians and those who think about Christians arrive at meaning.
Since I’ve bought into the narrative that Jesus was and is who he says he is, I endeavor to listen to his voice and understand the essence of his ministry. There is no doubt that he was big on discernment, the practice of differentiating one thing from another. He also did not shy away from judging the value of certain things, most importantly the nature of a person’s heart. Try as one might, he did not go about telling people to judge one another harshly, to always be on the lookout for sin, for instance. In fact, he went out of his way to teach and model the nature of grace and forgiveness, albeit with the understanding that honest repentance plays a big role in that supernatural equation.
When we try to get to the core of the Christian faith, a faith built upon the life and teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, known commonly as the Christ, we must arrive at the knowledge that it is all about changing the narrative of who God is and who we are in relation to him. This change in narrative is essential. What is also essential is that it is the heart that needs the most change. A narrative that leads with a judgmental head and neglects the nature of a softened heart is a narrative that, although common, is not one I find to be honest and accurate. In fact, it is helpful to put the two side by side and see how they play out through the lens of the God Jesus shows us.
So, in this era of constantly changing narratives with stories piling on top of stories, it’s no wonder we are a confused people, struggling for solid ground. For one, I try to peel away the layers to find the kernels of truth often hidden from plain view. Do we pause to do that work? Not so much, I think.
I love to hear people’s stories. I love to hear what people believe is of paramount value and why they think that. I love to know the kinds of things people believe are ultimately fulfilling and why.
The story I can’t shake or find fault with is one of brokenness and redemption. Of a people who are inherently flawed, constantly in search of fulfillment … of a better place than the one we currently occupy. Of a reality defined by love, where the currency is grace. I occupy a place in that story, which will be strange to many, even oft-putting. I know many others who find a home in that story, while I know of many or more who don’t. The nature of our existence is that there are multiple narratives out there and we have the choice of which to believe. Some believe that all stories are just that. Stories like the ones we hear as children, maybe resembling things that are true but falling short in the end. I disagree. Some stories are real, as real as anything. Which narratives do we believe are real?